Electric                    Astral               Pre-historical
Universe              Catastrophism        Reconstruction


Articles & Products Supporting the Pre-historical Reconstruction and Plasma Cosmology
 home       features       science/philosophy       wholesale store       used books        contact

Site Section Links

Introduction Material
The Third Story

Cosmology, Origins
The Nature of Time
Nature of Time video
The Nature of Space
The Neutrino Aether
Nature of Force Fields
Relativity Theory

Geophysical Material
Origin of Modern Geology
Niagara Falls Issues
Climate Change Model
Climate Change Questions

Philosophy Material
Philosophy Links

Reconstruction &
Mythology Material
Modern Mythology Material
Language/Symbol Development
1994 Velikovsky Symposium
Horus Journals TOC
Kronos Journals TOC
Pensee Journals TOC
Velikovskian Journals TOC
Selected Velikovskian Article

Miscellaneous Material
Modern Mythology
State of Religious Diversity
PDF Download Files
Open letter to science editors


KRONOS Vol X, No. 1

Vox Populi


To the Editor of KRONOS:

Non-linearities in space are considered here as propagating gravitational slopes inducing the present controversy known as "Planet X". When postulated as incoming red-shifted photons, the "brunt" shock front between the quantum, mass, and velocity of these photons at the surface of the Sun, as seen through a synchronous window, allows the relativistic effects to be known collectively as the sunspot cycle. The photons arrive with a message shaped in the ratio of phase velocity to velocity (2C:C), looking for a gravitational home proportional to the dimensions of their origin. Although the "Brunt-Absurdity" of the relativistic photoeffect operates at all latitudes, its highest probability of being observed is at fixed distances from the equatorial zone of the Sun, and at a spin space equivalent to the angular momentum.

In simple terms, a four-dimensional shock front goes away at one latitude giving a mathematical look into the curvature of the energy changes in observing the nature of Planet X, as red-shifted quanta terminate in the solar system. Without these reference periodicities the relativistic momentum is meaningless and the periodicities cannot be resolved.

The arriving photons, enveloped in periods of approximately 22 years, would retain the particle characteristic of electromagnetic energy, preserving the relationship of momentum and position (phase), that would then phase split the velocity component of the solar surface in minute incremental quantities. It is the concept of long periodicities and phase splitting that permits the development of a mathematical statement within the philosophy of this presentation. The philosophic concept being that of a volume Compton effect, but from the inside of the wave not the outside, one obtains a view that is never available from macro-observations of surface photoeffects at atomic dimensions.


The saw-toothed step of the gravitational "momentum-recoil" would remain in its original state relative to the phase angles of the electromagnetic energy. Complete red-shifted hydrogen photons of long wavelength should be expected. Weak gravitational forces? Probably true. But when coherently added, at the time of their arrival, the summation might explain the unusual associations observed between planetary orbits and the sunspot cycle. (1,2,3,4,5,6)


The existence of red-shifted time periods, converging in a mass of hf/c2 in magnitudes equivalent to hydrogen spectrum emission during the time of the origin of the universe, phased into packet periodicities of 22 years on arrival, would not infer that calculations to discover Planet X locations are not important. Just the opposite. To find the rotating vector of the spiraling "time component" requires many calculations of exact reference points. Further development of these measurements is of primary importance in resolving the issue.


Planet X does not disturb the inner planets(7) . . . Only the orbits of the large outer planets . . . Therefore: The position of the center of gravity must be found far from the orbit of the inner planets . . . Wrong! If the inner planets are not being perturbed by Planet X and the large outer ones are, the velocity components of the smaller ones must already have been made synchronous to the components of the gravitational perturbations. There is no other cogent answer!


The pulse period "in gravitational units of time", a time period for energy to traverse through the three stages of energy, can be calculated mathematically as well as physically observed on the solar surface. The period T* opens a viewing window to the incoming shock front of Compton recoil and is observed as the aged magnetic wave enters the solar plasma.

If incoming waves are to penetrate a conductive surface effectively the characteristics of the spin in the incoming photo must match the surface motion exactly. This requirement would occur most effectively at certain latitudes, i.e., where the sidereal rotation of the Sun is(8)

25d .0548 + 4d .521 sin2q (Eq. 1)

at a latitude of maximum sunspots of ± 13 deg 11' 29" as observed on the Sun, in synchronism with a rotation of the molecular energy states with a periodicity equivalent to:

T* = 2C/g = 25.29024 days, (Eq. 2)

a period calculated from the velocity of light and the value of gravity at the surface of the Sun.(8)


The period of T* actually develops in two states of energy but manifests itself where the measurement is radial in a large body where both components can be equated into a single momentum term, gravity. The energy change needed to radially contract a large gravitational body by a very small amount can be approximated by:

D E = ––––-  -  –––
2(R-DR) 2R

––– DR

(Eq. 3)

where G is the universal gravitational constant, R is the Radius and M is the mass of the spherical body. If the gravitational acceleration is expressed in the usual way,

g = ––– , then
DE = Mg ––––

(Eq. 4)

The energy carried by a single photon is E = hf, where h is Planck's constant and f is the frequency of the wave. The total energy leaving the radiating body is the sum of all the energies of all the photons, S E = Shf. (The photon emission is assumed to be essentially radial from the theoretical location of the mass M.)

The momentum of the photon is P = E/C = hf/C. The total momentum is the sum of the momentum of all the photons leaving, PT = ET/C = S hf/C. Both the energy and the momentum of the photons must be reflected in the energy loss and recoil of the radiating body.

DE = DM C2 = Si h fi
PDR = MvDR = Si h fi/C
MCvDR = DM C2 = Mg ––-  (Eq. 5)

The radially inward momentum becomes a progressive force. VDR may be expressed as a radial change of DR divided by the rotational period.

MCvDR = M C ––-  = Mg –––
T* 2

T* = 2C /g (Eq. 6)

The strange value of 2C in the numerator of T* is known as "The Volume Photoelectric Effect absurdity.(9) It's a relativistic change in the state of the energy that cannot occur at the rest state condition of the electron. It requires momentum to execute. The v=2C absurdity can be shown in the following direct substitution of the quanta hf:

œmv2 = hf, mv = hf/2 = h/l, v = 2c (Eq. 7).

Where the photon wavelength is extremely long, the relative motion of the electrons in the conducting plane would be small in comparison to the wavelength. Thus, the target is made to look like a lattice of electrons at rest, preventing the quantum from executing with a surface effect. When 2C cannot execute as momentum V = 2C, an absurdity is inferred. The energy must take another form; the introduction of mass as an offset of time is one such inference.

In the "Brunt Absurdity" shock front T*, one can presume the synchronous window displayed at latitudes of ± 13.2 to be a crossover point with rotation as the momentum coupling efficiency changes, increasing inversely (perhaps proportional) to the latitude. Although T* is not restricted from operating over any part of the solar surface, the coupling factor to momentum approaches zero at the poles. Thus, the volume-momentum transfer efficiency should be highest in the plane of the equator. This would be in a zone of an imaginary Saturn-like ring around the Sun. A sidereal referenced differential rate for a relativistic knot to travel around that ring, changing the momentum, would be a period of time within the rotation of the equator of:

1/25.0548 days - 1/25.29024 days = 1/7.369 years (Eq. 8)

(where the terrestrial year is 365.2422 days).

The period of 7.369 years, the third harmonic of the sunspot cycle, having been calculated completely from handbook tables(8) without modification, is used henceforth to present the sunspot cycles as absolute terms of 22.107 years and 11.054 years. This trick temporarily eliminates the effects of the outer planets.(3) Effects of the hypothetical Planet X on the inner planets can then be isolated.

The combination of an inferred electromagnetic compression during each polar intensification of 11.054 years superimposed with a third harmonic component of the mean rate of the 22.107 year suggests a stable system with "the characteristic of a square wave oscillator switching electromagnetically between stable states every 11.054 years with a second order 3rd harmonic damping transient(11) terminating the excess energy in differential solar rotation". In other words, the switching knot in the state change would traverse the solar circumference exactly three times every 22.107 years. But, for a quanta-like step to pulse couple into that ring, the space occupied by the ring must have the same characteristics. How can this be? Where is the momentum-position that sets up the characteristic of a filter that would allow only one periodicity of a quanta-like wave to get to the solar surface?


A wave coupling mechanism is revealed in the solar system by slightly remodulating the period of T* by the momentum switch periodicity rate of the period of the sunspot cycle (11.054 years). (Year = 365.2422 days.)

1/T* + 1/11.054 years = 1/25.132808 days (Eq. 9)

The result is seemingly useless, until one recognizes that 25.132808 days is 8 days - a relativistic term requiring the "totality" of space, and inferring that the core of the p Planet X is an inherent part of the magnetic field of the Earth; a continuous wave, that is both propagated and time-shifted relativistically from an original state through a time curvature of 8pT.

It has always bothered me as to how the Earth's magnetic field rotates slightly faster than the Earth.(10) This could explain it. The magnetic field of the Earth is latticed to a rope characteristic of Space, a magnetic drive sustaining the rotation of the Earth. The slip rate is the differential drag in a standard motorising function, like an induction motor rated to turn at 1750 RPM under load while the magnetic fields are turning at 1800 RPM.


Bagby lists a solution for the massive solar companion, giving it an orbit of 1 AU (solar distance to Earth) with a total mass of 1% of the Sun.(7) I can agree to this location as the center of gravitational distortion, but would add a relativistic curvature of 25.132808 days to the Earth with the magnetic field of the Earth being inside the pulse-coupled core of the galactic-sized distribution of pulse effects.


The face of Mercury turns toward the Sun once every two orbits. It can be said to rotate turbulently coupled to the Sun. But the face of Venus and the Moon turn toward the Earth during each Synodic, a period of about 584 days. This difference obviously separates different sets of coupling factors. Venus and the Earth-Moon pair are inside one system while Mercury and the Sun are inside the other. The Sun, by definition, must have a volume-plasma-effect to capture long wavelength photons 2C/g, while the surface of the shell of events would be beyond 1 AU.


For lack of a better expression for the multidimensional root products of turbulence that would surge between the Sun and the edge of the Planet X nearest the Sun, I will write the driving frequency in cycles/pulse time as:

fn = SQRT(x c / 8g) (Eq. 10)

Where x is a dimensionless parameter characterizing the damping factor,(11) c the attenuation factor,g the ratio of specific heats, and where the specific heat ratio is allowed to come to unity between any two locations along the ring of oscillation with an infinite amount of time for the oscillating parameters to reach stability in order to effect an attenuation damping product of unity, then

fn = SQRT( 1/8) cycles/pulse time constant (Eq. 11)

Or for the natural period of the radial pulse inherent to the ring Pn

1/fn = Pn = SQRT(8.00002) days/cycle (Eq. 12)

effecting a synchronous lock of the sidereal periodicity of Mercury

Merc 87.9692542 days
––-  =  ––––––––––  =  9.900007 cycles (Eq. 13).
pPn pSQRT(8.00002) days/cycle

If the above ratio is real, as a time line of some kind between the magnetic components driving the Earth's rotation and the magnetic components of the sunspot cycle, then those same components should effect the Earth-Venus synodic operating as an inherent part of the core of the transform between the inner and outer photoeffect zones. Ergo, Planet X.

The "momentum area" of ring structures, in the equator of the Sun and Saturn, suggests momentum linearity as a necessity to achieve an electromagnetic transform to the quanta, namely a circular orbit. Venus has such a circular orbit, and is also face-centering to the Lunar-Earth pulse. A combination of the inner planet motions could phase the photon release. In other words, create the transform needed to filter-capture a specific photon frequency. The sunspot cycle would then show the energies of the wave as they terminated. This can be schematically shown as:

Circular Ring Momentum Match X Planet Transform Red-Shifted Photon Component
Venus Orbit Period








-   –––––


p 0.185503354y



Venus Harmonic Symmetry












As the photon's gravitational energies joined the surface of the Sun in bursts, the orbit of Mercury would slowly begin to accumulate characteristic ratios of the magnetic field of the Earth in major units of the day.

(9.9 to 1.) In roots of p period turbulance p SQRT[N] (Eq. 15]

where N is 2 and 3. Multiples of surface photon couplings in magnetic field Earth-days can be suggested as related to finalizing the orbit shape. In other words, other stars could have exactly the same planetary configurations.

87.9692542 days
––––––––––   =   turbulent couplings in the p transformation (Eq. 16)

But the magnetic field of the Earth, if spatially related to photon arrival, should slip sometimes, if it doesn't have electron symmetry. Thus, there may be no way to tell if the 9.9/1 ratio of the p period pulse of Eq. 13 is in turn related to the 11/1 years magnetic period of sunspot cycle to Earth orbit (magnetic) 9.9/11 = 0.9, of Eq. 14 in a "locked" ratio related to momentum and damping factors that shift frequency.(11)

There seems to be many indicators of electromagnetic couplings, but only one indication of a quanta recoil period short enough to be called a "momentum linearity disturbance" in the shell of the inner planets. This quantized event seems to be observed following the largest of the electromagnetic solar displays. The reference date for the beginning is October 30.140, 1962, delayed about 180 deg from the peak of the 11 year electromagnetic compression in 1957-58.

The pulse, coupling toward the core of the Bagby p planet (measured in ephemeris data) consists of a three body alignment of Venus, Earth and Moon, followed by 26.262 days later by a second alignment. The symmetry of these dates of alignment brackets the November 13.5, 1962 Venus-Earth Synodic creating a theoretical match in period-of-recoil to the idealized (mean period) Synodic filter shown in Eq. 17 (unperturbed by the outer planets(3)). The Fourier transform (century-long envelopes) synthesized in the system would "trick" the aged photons into terminating to the image of its red-shifted origin whenever the filter is aligned and not reflecting (phaseshifting) the incoming components.

Momentum trap
Venus Synodic
(sets sidereal angle)
Quanta trap pulse Curvature between
Wave packet and Pulse
(surface and volume(12))
1 1 1
–––––––-   +   –––––––––   =   –––––- (Eq. 17)
583.9378 days 26.263108 days 8p days

In conclusion: The Volume Photoeffects depicted herein terminate into the surface of the Sun with a spin of 1 and a "brunt" phase velocity of 2C. The period of this spin, relative to the equatorial rotation is the 3rd harmonic of one full cycle of the direction of the energy in the spin. This type of thinking enhances the concept of relativity, in that it makes the apparent age of the total universe relative to the angular momentum present in a local space (our space being coherently matched to the Sun through the inner planets).

If areas of space are just variations of focal holes with red-shifted referenced gravitational spins of 1 from origins in the past, the spins of 1/2 referenced to the same point of origin should also terminate in the space with information of the spin-space as carried forward in the photon. (The information carried forward in time is the "Brunt Absurdity" of phase velocity 2C in a velocity C.) Entering a space red-shifted, the photons inject the information randomly until some semblance of order is formed at macro-dimensions. Thereafter, the momentum would tend to filter and be selective of that which was available.

If red-shifted magnetic information is being trapped, then all plasma fields should be suspect of being of red-shifted photon origin. All large target dimensions could carry a summation of the image of intersecting photons. Similar packets of planets should exist around similar stars.

Does a Spin of 1/2 also exist relativistically in a SURFACE PHOTOEFFECT at some distance from the Sun? I suggest that the reader guess the period of the relativistic knot of the Earth's magnetic field, then calculate the knot motion, or spin of 1/2 (C/g), in the strong magnetic currents of the upper atmosphere (100 km value of g = 950 cm/sec2). Is it real?

If the value of C/g is an incoming photon memory of a spin of 1/2 in a Surface Photoelectric effect, and 2C/g that of a Volume Photoelectric effect, there is a potential use for the information. If the recoil positioning of the filter motions of momentum and position are known, with the displayed effects phased through the filter as measurable on the Sun, then everything can be known to make Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle go down the drain. Although a full shape of atomic space might not be known from the focused effects known as "Planet X", the synchronous termination of an 8 space in a "brunt volume effect" would shake probability statistics to the core at least for the time period in the transition of energy states. What do you think? Is the red-shifted information warping the positions of our planets? Is the "Absurdity Principle" of terminating energy in two types of space, volume and surface, too absurd?

Now that I have the attention of a crowd, will the two-faced mathematical operator of 1/8p hiding behind the Hamiltonian-Maxwell linear-space-interface justification for Dk : | Dc (12) please stand up in a relatively larger time-spread opening. Please! Show your absurd kinky slope in the vector of time!

Dk : > Dc . Thank you. (Eq. 18)

Robert A. Bureau

Colfax, WA


1. Malburet, J., Astonomie, 39, pp. 503-515 (1925).
2. Bigg, E. K., Ast r. J., 72, pp. 463466 (1967).
3. Bureau, R. A. and Craine, L. B., Nature, 228, p. 984 (1970).
4. Wood, K. D., Nature, 240, pp. 91-93 (1972).
5. Wood, R. M., Nature, 255, pp. 312-313 (1975).
6. Bagby, J. P., Nature, 253, p. 482 (1975).
7. Bagby, J. P., papers in preparation (1983).
8. STANDARDS: The American Ephemeris and Nautical Almanac, Explanatory Supplement, Handbook of Chemistry & Physics ( 1982) .
9. Van Der Ziel, A., Solid State Physical Electronics, pp.173-174 ( 1957) .
10. Mohr, R. E., pp. 4345, Creer, K. M., pp. 293-315, Growth Rhythms and the History of the Earth's Rotation, Ed. Roseberg, R. M. (1975).
11. D'Azzo & Houpis, Feedback Control System Analysis and Synthesis, pp. 80-83 (1966).
12. Schiff, L. I., Quantum Mechanics, pp. 13, 14, 366 (1949).

 home       features       science/philosophy       wholesale store        policies        contact
Mikamar Publishing, 16871 SE 80th Pl,  Portland  OR  97267       503-974-9665