Electric                    Astral               Pre-historical
Universe              Catastrophism        Reconstruction


     Mikamar
           Publishing
 

Articles & Products Supporting the Pre-historical Reconstruction and Plasma Cosmology
 home       features       science/philosophy       wholesale store       used books        contact

Site Section Links

Introduction Material
Articles
The Third Story
Features

Cosmology, Origins
The Nature of Time
Nature of Time video
The Nature of Space
The Neutrino Aether
Nature of Force Fields
Relativity Theory

Geophysical Material
Origin of Modern Geology
Niagara Falls Issues
Climate Change Model
Climate Change Questions

Philosophy Material
Philosophy Links

Reconstruction &
Mythology Material
Modern Mythology Material
Language/Symbol Development
1994 Velikovsky Symposium
Horus Journals TOC
Kronos Journals TOC
Pensee Journals TOC
Velikovskian Journals TOC
Selected Velikovskian Article

Miscellaneous Material
Modern Mythology
State of Religious Diversity
PDF Download Files
Open letter to science editors

KRONOS Vol VII, No. 1

Corrigenda et Addenda

8/81

To the Editor of KRONOS:

In VI :4, following Parker, I accepted Dystros 24 Macedonian as the beginning of the regnal year at the time of the Canopus Decree. Both Parker and I had been persuaded by the arguments of Samuel (Ptolemaic Chronology, 1962). Unbeknownst to me, however, and presumably to Parker as well, Samuel has long since withdrawn much of his support for Dystros 24. In his Greek and Roman Chronology (1972), he admits to having misinterpreted one of the relevant documents. That document, PCZ 59139, actually suggests that the regnal year began no earlier than Dystros 27. On the other hand, PCZ 59203 can be understood only if the regnal year began precisely on Dystros 24. Samuel still inclines toward Dystros 24, on the basis of all of the evidence available, especially PCZ 59203, but he grants (pages 147-148) that the date "is not yet certainly known" and that the question "must be left open", even with "the 24th explaining the most evidence". Under these circumstances, Parker's claim that Samuel has "conclusively" established the 24th is repudiated by Samuel himself, and my own acceptance of the 24th should have been qualified with a "probably".

Lynn E. Rose

* * *

In KRONOS VI:4 page 65, the publisher of Isaac Asimov's Science Fiction Magazine should have been listed as Joel Davis.

 home       features       science/philosophy       wholesale store        policies        contact
Mikamar Publishing, 16871 SE 80th Pl,  Portland  OR  97267       503-974-9665